[Update] Serverside MMO room creation.

[meanvel]

Update: Well, this works... But, it's still kinda odd that getParentZone().createRoom() still creates the room, but with many variables missing?

//Works
getApi().createRoom(getParentZone(),Cfg,null);

//Creates room, but half the variables missing...
//getParentZone().createRoom(Cfg);


Only like half the room settings are being set properly. No errors in the log... Marked are the ones not set properly. Odd...

Code: Select all

11 Mar 2017 | 02:31:42,711 | INFO  | SFSWorker:Ext:2 | Extensions |     | {Gooberland}: Create room
11 Mar 2017 | 02:31:42,730 | INFO  | SFSWorker:Ext:2 | entities.managers.SFSRoomManager |     | Room created: { Zone: Gooberland }, [ MMORoom: Test, Id: 8, Group: default, AOI: (14, 14, 0) ], type = MMORoom
11 Mar 2017 | 02:31:42,993 | INFO  | main | jetty.util.log |     | Logging initialized @2160ms


[Bax]

You are not supposed to use the "createRoom" method on the Zone object. In fact in the API doc, that method has no description (which indicates you should not use it). Always use the methods on the SFSApi class to interact with SFS in your Extension.
The reason why it doesn't work is that the API class adds more logic to set everything up (for example notify the clients, but not only) before calling the Zone.createRoom method internally.

[meanvel]

Ah, sorry. My IDE just pulls code suggestions out and I assumed that the available methods it shows me are good.

You are not supposed to use the "createRoom" method on the Zone object. In fact in the API doc, that method has no description (which indicates you should not use it).

[Bax]

Yes, that's unfortunate. There's no way to hide methods you are not supposed to use. The only way we could figure out is not to comment them, but this forces you to check the API doc.